Switching jobs—again? It'll cost ya
Early in my career, I was a habitual job hopper. I held my first four jobs in five years. The restlessness wasn't without source; I was in the midst of a search for a vocation that would define me, if I want to be all existential about it. The good news is I found it. Here I am, an 11-year veteran at the same dang employer. The bad news is I've been eating the same cafeteria food for over a decade now. You know you've been here too long when you've memorized the daily soup special.
It's nice to settle down, job-wise, if only to avoid the hassle of ordering new business cards every 12 months. But it turns out I'm also scoring major financial gain by staying in place. New research finds that workers who change jobs a lot wind up earning less than those who stay put.
The study, published in the February issue of the American Sociological Review, the journal of the American Sociological Association, sought to determine the impact of career mobility on worker's wages. Sociologist Sylvia Fuller of the University of British Columbia tracked nearly 6,000 workers during their first 12 years in the labor market.
Here's why job-hopping costs workers:
• In the first five years of a job, Fuller found each year of tenure is associated with approximately 2.4% higher wages for men and 2.9% higher wages for women. In other words, earnings, like interest, compounds; if you miss the raises that come with tenure, your later earnings will reflect that loss.
• Job-hoppers tend to spend a greater proportion of time unemployed.
• A greater proportion of their job changes are the result of layoffs.
Fuller doesn't address the oft-heard argument that the best way to get a raise is to take a new job. But she does find that job-hopping "can be a wage asset when it is concentrated in the early years of employment and not coupled with layoffs, discharges, employment gaps or family-related leave. In this case, moderate or even high levels of mobility can lead to equal or better wage outcomes than stability."
So hop away, young 'uns. Just settle down before too long. You could always skip the caf and brown-bag a sandwich.
Add Your Comment:
Most Popular »
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- Is Harry Reid Burning Out?
- How Will Obama Pay For Stimulus 2.1? (or 3.0, 3.1, whatever you want to call it)
- The Health Reform Abortion Wars, Part Deux
- "How Will Dave Ever Make Fun of Sex Scandals Again?"
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- Why Wells Fargo isn't paying back TARP
- Quinnipiac: Obama Gets Bump on Afghanistan
- Economists Growing More Wary of the Senate Health Bill
- How to Outsmart a Debt Collector
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Tiger Woods Must Face His Fans' Moral Outrage
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- Creating Jobs: Can Obama Government Boost Employment?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Time to Give Up the Ghost on bin Laden
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Study: Parents' Sex Talks with Kids Happening Too Late













RSS